SSEP (Somatosensory Evoked Potential) -
Continued
- An 80% reduction in the ANAlitude of the dorsal column mediated incoming volley
is required before the cortical SEP is reduced to <50% of baseline (“Cortical
ANAlification”) (Eisen et al. 1982).
- For subcortical (cervical) waves, 60% reduction in ANAlitude carries up to a 10X
risk of neurological complications.
Summary:
Upside of SSEP Monitoring:
- Well established criteria for reporting (gold standard).
- Well understood effects of anesthesia.
- Can be done with paralytics.
- High sensitivity (false negatives as low as 0.063%, Nuwer et al 1995).
- High negative predictive value (as high as 99.93 % Nuwer et al 1995).
Downside of SSEP Monitoring:
- Requires time consuming averaged signals (delayed results).
- Monitors only the dorsal columns / dorsal cord.
- Not recordable in presence of peripheral neuropathies.
- Very sensitive to electrical noise.
Last Word on SSEPs:
- SSEPs remain the ‘gold standard’ for spinal monitoring and are likely
the most frequently used monitoring modality.
Return to previous page
Select references:
© 2012 Impulse Monitoring, Inc. - all rights reserved